Sep 02, 2015

TENTATIVE RULINGS

GUARDIANSHIP CALENDAR

Wednesday, September 2, 2015, 9:00 A.M.

Courtroom 12 – Hon. James Bertoli

600 Administration Drive, Santa Rosa

 

The following tentative rulings will become the ruling of the court unless a party desires to be heard. If you desire to appear and present oral argument in opposition to a tentative ruling or to a petition, you must notify the Judicial Assistant at (707) 521-6563 and all other interested parties or their respective attorneys of your intent to appear. The notification must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on September 1, 2015.  If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

 

1. SPR-81022 – Guardianship of David Bryan Cox, III
          Motion for Visitation denied. Moving party has made no showing that a specific visitation schedule is in the best interests of the minor child. The Court’s decision does not prohibit the moving party from having visits with the minor child, but such visits are within the sound discretion of the co-guardians exercising their authority under the letters of guardianship.
 
2. SPR-85765 – Guardianship of Liam Galinis
          Appearance required.       
 
3. SPR-88067 – Guardianship of Cecily Megan Rockwood
          Appearance required.
 
4. SPR-88112 – Guardianship of Miguel E. Maciel Cornejo
          Appearance required.
 
5. SPR-88166 – Guardianship of Ricardo Nicholas Roman
          This matter is continued to the Guardianship Calendar of October 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 12. As Father is subject to a conservatorship, it is necessary for Father’s conservator to be served with the pleadings in this action.
 
6. SPR-88168 – Guardianship of Cassidy Rae Slayton
          Matter is continued to Guardianship Calendar of October 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. in order for proposed co-guardians to perfect service on maternal grandfather and paternal grandparents.
 
7. SPR-88170 – Guardianship of Ethan Thomas Willard
          Petition for Guardianship is dismissed with prejudice. This matter is not within the jurisdiction of the State of California and is under the jurisdiction of the State of South Carolina.
 
© 2015 Superior Court of Sonoma County