Skip to main content
Skip to main content.

Case Management Calendar

Court Call is not permitted for this calendar.

If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary via Zoom or in person unless otherwise indicated. 

The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard.  If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Honigsberg’s Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6723 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing.

TO JOIN “ZOOM” ONLINE,

TO JOIN “ZOOM” ONLINE,
Department 18 : https://sonomacourt-org.zoomgov.com/j/1607394368?pwd=aW1JTWlIL3NBeE9LVHU2NVVpQlVRUT09

Meeting ID: 160—739—4368

Password: 000169

TO JOIN “ZOOM” BY PHONE,

  • By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar):
  • +1 (669) 254-5252 US 

Guide for participating in court proceedings via Zoom in Department 18.

  • After joining the meeting and checking in with the clerk, please mute your audio when not speaking. This helps keep background noise to a minimum.
  • Be mindful of background noise when your microphone is not muted. Avoid activities that could create additional noise, such as shuffling papers.
  • Position your camera properly if you choose to use a web camera. Be sure it is in a stable position and focused at eye level, if possible. Make sure everything visible in the frame is appropriate for an appearance in court.
  • If a confidential session becomes necessary it is incumbent on you to ensure you are able to participate from a private location so that unauthorized people cannot overhear or see the proceedings.
  • Chat is enabled for the sharing of documents among participants and the court and to allow attorneys to communicate individually with each other or their clients only. No chat messages should be sent privately to the court as it would amount to an unauthorized ex parte communication. Neither should chat messages be sent to all participants unless directed by the court.
  • The recording function has been disabled. Remember, the prohibition against recording court proceedings, even remote ones, remains.
  • Be patient. Check in will take more time and the experience from those who have tried this before is that proceedings are a little slower generally. 

Tentative Rulings

Tuesday, June 25, 2024, at 3:00 p.m.   

6/25 CMC CALENDAR/5331

The following cases are required to appear at 3:00 p.m. in Dept. 18

23CV01133, Pulido v. Safeway Inc.

23CV01462, Sugg v. Wild

24CV00735, Briggs v. General Motors LLC

SCV-267525, Fallquist v. Stanton

SCV-271884, Cresson v. Always Engineering, Inc.

SCV-272735, Prossegger, JR. v. Monsanto Company

SCV-273561, Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Canonico

The following cases will be continued to a further CMC/OSC calendar in Courtroom 18 (no appearance is required on June 25, 2024):

23CV00926, Wallahan v. Silvermark Construction Services, Inc.—Continued to 10/15/24 for Service of Complaint, Settled Pleadings, and Trial Setting.

23CV00980, Gonzalez v. Gutierrez—Continued to 10/22/24 for Service of Complaint as to Defendant Robert Fosnot Jr. and Settled Pleadings.

24CV00705, Anthony v. Whitmire—Continued to 10/29/24 for Status after Defendant Robert Whitmire’s Demurrer, Service of Complaint as to other Defendants, and Settled Pleadings.

MCV-260734, Absolute Resolutions v. Mendoza- Continued to 10/1/24 for Default/Judgment.

SCV-270918, Johnson v. American Pacific Builders- Continued to 10/8/24 for possible filing of First Amended Complaint.

SCV-271680, Toothman v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.- Continued to 11/12/24 for status of Arbitration.

SCV-272299, Abraham v. Foppoli- Continued to 10/29/24 for status update after demurrer & motion to strike.

The following cases will be set for trial with notice to follow (no appearance is required):   

None.

The following cases have been dropped for various reasons:     

SCV-271736, Biosphere Watch Group v. Veritas Farms, Inc.

Was this helpful?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.