Skip to main content
Skip to main content.

Family Law Tentative Rulings - Courtroom 20

Commissioner Megan Amaral

Law & Motion Calendar

The following Tentative Rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. If you desire to appear and present oral argument as to any motion, it will be necessary for you to contact the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707)-521-6836 by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing. Any party requesting an appearance must notify all other opposing parties of their intent to appear.

PLEASE NOTE: If argument is requested in this matter you may appear in person or remotely via Zoom. To appear via Zoom please see the Zoom information below. 

To appear online via Zoom please use the following link:

To appear via Zoom by phone:

  • Call: +1 669-254-5252
  • Enter the Meeting ID: 161-271-2563
  • Passcode: 026215

Law & Motion Tentative Rulings

March 20, 2026 9:30 a.m. 

1. 23FL00010, James v Lozinto

Petitioner, Renee James (“Petitioner”) filed the instant petition to establish parental relationship (“Petition”) against Respondent Eric Lozinto (“Respondent”). This matter was previously continued from December 11, 2025, to the instant date for the parties to filed supplemental briefing regarding the jurisdiction of the Court over the issue of the minor child’s parentage given the prior juvenile dependency action in the state of Washington. Since then, the Department of Child Support Services has intervened in the action (the “Department”). The filings of both parties appear to have been rejected by the Clerk for failure to conform to format, and the Department does not appear to have notice of the requested briefing. Accordingly, the Court must continue the matter so that the parties may submit the required briefing which meets the requirements of the rules of court, and so that the Department may submit briefing on the instant issue.

Therefore, the Motion is CONTINUED to June 5th, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in department 23.

2. 24FL00616, Richardson Dissolution

Motion to withdraw as attorney for Respondent, Micheal Joseph Richardson, is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to submit a completed proposed order to the Court via efiling for review and signature.

Was this helpful?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.